Publication: Advantages of Percent Weight Loss as a Method of Reporting Weight Loss after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Open/View Files
Date
2012
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Hatoum, Ida J., and Lee M. Kaplan. 2012. “Advantages of Percent Weight Loss as a Method of Reporting Weight Loss after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.” Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 21 (8): 1519-1525. doi:10.1002/oby.20186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20186.
Research Data
Abstract
Objective: Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a generally effective treatment for severe obesity, weight loss (WL) after this operation is highly variable. Accurate predictors of outcome would thus be useful in identifying those patients who would most benefit from this invasive therapy. WL has been characterized using several different metrics, including the number of BMI units lost (ΔBMI), percent baseline WL (%WL), and percent excess body WL (%EBWL). To identify clinically relevant predictors most sensitively it is necessary to avoid confounding by other factors, including preoperative BMI (pBMI), the strongest known predictor of RYGB-induced WL. Design and Methods To determine the WL measure least associated with pBMI, we analyzed outcomes of 846 patients undergoing RYGB. Results: Patients in this cohort had an average pBMI of 50.0 kg/m2. At weight nadir, they lost an average 19.4 kg/m2, 38.7% WL, and 81.2% EBWL. pBMI was strongly and positively associated with ΔBMI at both one year (r=0.56, p=4.7×10−51) and nadir (r=0.58, p=2.8×10−77) and strongly but negatively associated with %EBWL at one year (r=−0.52, p=3.8×10−44) and nadir (r=−0.45, p=7.2×10−43). In contrast, pBMI was not significantly associated with %WL at one year (r=0.04, p=0.33), and only weakly associated at nadir (r=0.13, p=0.0002). Conclusions: Of the metrics examined, %WL is the parameter describing WL after RYGB least influenced by pBMI. It thus improves comparison of WL outcomes across studies of patients undergoing surgery and facilitates the most sensitive identification of novel predictors of surgery-induced WL. We therefore recommend that %WL be adopted more broadly in reporting weight loss after RYGB.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service