Publication:
Standardized Measurement of the Future Liver Remnant Prior to Extended Liver Resection: Methodology and Clinical Associations

Thumbnail Image

Date

2000

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas, Amin Chaoui, Kim-Anh Do, Malcolm M. Bilimoria, Marc J. Fenstermacher, Chuslip Charnsangavej, Marshall Hicks, et al. 2000. Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: Methodology and clinical associations. Surgery 127(5): 512–519.

Research Data

Abstract

Background. There is no agreement regarding the preoperative measurement of liver volumes and the minimal safe size of the liver remnant after extended hepatectomy. Methods. In 20 patients with hepatobiliary malignancy and no underlying chronic liver disease, volumetric measurements of the liver remnant (segments 2 and 3 ± 1) were obtained before extended right lobectomy (right trisegmentectomy). The ratios of future liver remnant to total liver volume were calculated by using a formula based on body surface area. In 12 patients, response to preoperative right trisectoral portal vein embolization was evaluated. In 15 patients who underwent the planned resection, preoperative volumes were correlated with biochemical and clinical outcome parameters. Results. The future liver remnants increased after portal vein embolization (26% versus 36%, P < .01). Smaller size liver remnants were associated with an increase in postoperative liver function tests (P < .05) and longer lengths of hospital stay (P < .02). Preliminary data indicates an increase in major complications for liver volumes ≤25% (P = .02). Conclusions. A simple method of measurement provides an assessment of the liver remnant before resection. It is useful in evaluating response to portal vein embolization and in predicating the outcome before extended liver resections. (Surgery 2000;127:512–9.)

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories