Publication:
Individual differences in relational motives interact with the political context to produce terrorism and terrorism-support

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

ThomsenObaidiSheehy-SkeffingtonKteilySidaniusSubmitted-libre.pdf (220.06 KB)

Date

2014

Authors

Published Version

10.1017/S0140525X13003579

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Thomsen, Lotte, Milan Obaidi, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Nour Kteily, and Jim Sidanius. 2014. “Individual Differences in Relational Motives Interact with the Political Context to Produce Terrorism and Terrorism-Support.” Behav Brain Sci 37 (04) (August): 377–378. doi:10.1017/s0140525x13003579.

Research Data

Abstract

The psychology of suicide terrorism involves more than simply the psychology of suicide. Individual differences in Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) interact with socio-structural, political context to produce support for group-based dominance among members of both dominant and subordinate groups. This may help explain why, in one specific context, some people commit and endorse terrorism, while others do not.

Description

Other Available Sources

http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/sidaniuslab/publications/individual-differences-relational-motives%E2%80%A8interact-political-context

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

URI

http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:14302019

Collections

FAS Scholarly Articles

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories