Publication:
Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?

Thumbnail Image

Date

2001

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Johns Hopkins University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Alesina, Alberto, Edward L. (Edward Ludwig) Glaeser, and Burce Sacerdote. 2001. “Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2001 (2): 187–277.

Research Data

Abstract

European countries are much more generous to the poor relative to the US level of generosity. Economic models suggest that redistribution is a function of the variance and skewness of the pre-tax income distribution, the volatility of income (perhaps because of trade shocks), the social costs of taxation and the expected income mobility of the median voter. None of these factors appear to explain the differences between the US and Europe. Instead, the differences appear to be the result of racial heterogeneity in the US and American political institutions. Racial animosity in the US makes redistribution to the poor, who are disproportionately black, unappealing to many voters. American political institutions limited the growth of a socialist party, and more generally limited the political power of the poor.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

macroeconomics; United States; European-Style Welfare State

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories