A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success
Open/View files
Date
2014
Author(s)
Ash, Joan S
Erickson, Jessica L
Wasserman, Joe
Bunce, Arwen
Stanescu, Ana
St Hilaire, Daniel
Panzenhagen, Morgan
Gebhardt, Eric
McMullen, Carmit
Middleton, Blackford
Sittig, Dean F
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Wright, A., J. S. Ash, J. L. Erickson, J. Wasserman, A. Bunce, A. Stanescu, D. St Hilaire, et al. 2014. “A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 21 (3): 464-472. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. Materials and methods We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. Results: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. Discussion All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. Conclusions: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts.
Other Available Sources
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
Collection