Publication: Treatment Failure Among Infected Periprosthetic Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Bentham Open
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Schwarzkopf, Ran, Bassem Mikhael, Elizabeth Wright, Daniel M Estok, and Jeffrey N Katz. 2014. “Treatment Failure Among Infected Periprosthetic Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.” The Open Orthopaedics Journal 8 (1): 118-124. doi:10.2174/1874325020140515002. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325020140515002.
Research Data
Abstract
Two-stage revision has been shown to be the most successful treatment in eradicating deep infection following total hiparthroplasty. We identified 62 patients treated by a two-stage revision. We defined “successful revision” as negative intraoperative cultures and no further infection-related procedure. We defined “eradication of infection” on the basis of negative cultures and clinical diagnosis at least one year after 2nd stage procedure. After a mean follow up of 2.7 years, eradication of the infection was documented in 91.1%, and a successful two-stage revision in 85.7% of patients. We observed no association between higher pre-reimplantation levels of ESR and C-reactive protein and lower likelihood of successful two-stage revision. We found an association between a history of another previous infected prosthetic joint and a failed 2nd stage procedure. Failure to achieve eradication of infection and successful two-stage revision occurs infrequently. Patients with prior history of a previous prosthetic joint infection are at higher risk of failure.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Hip arthroplasty, modular antibiotic cement spacer, periprosthetic infection, two-stage revision surgery.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service