Publication:
Hazardous Heuristics

Thumbnail Image

Date

2015-01-28

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Cass R. Sunstein, Hazardous Heuristics (Pub. L. & Legal Theory Working Papers No. 33, 2002).

Research Data

Abstract

New work on heuristics and biases has explored the role of emotions and affect; the idea of “dual processing”; the place of heuristics and biases outside of the laboratory; and the implications of heuristics and biases for policy and law. This review-essay focuses on certain aspects of Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edited by Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman. An understanding of heuristics and biases casts light on many issues in law, involving jury awards, risk regulation, and political economy in general. Some attention is given to the possibility of “moral heuristics”—rules of thumb, for purposes of morality, that generally work well but that also systematically misfire.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories