Publication:

Earthquake Cycle Deformation in the Tibetan Plateau with a Weak Mid-Crustal Layer

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2013

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

DeVries, Phoebe M. R., and Brendan J. Meade. 2013. “Earthquake Cycle Deformation in the Tibetan Plateau with a Weak Mid-Crustal Layer.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118 (6) (June): 3101–3111. doi:10.1002/jgrb.50209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50209.

Abstract

Geodetic observations of interseismic deformation across the Tibetan plateau contain information about both tectonic and earthquake cycle processes. Time-variations in surface velocities between large earthquakes are sensitive to the rheological structure of the subseismogenic crust, and, in particular, the viscosity of the middle and lower crust. Here we develop a semianalytic solution for time-dependent interseismic velocities resulting from viscoelastic stress relaxation in a localized midcrustal layer in response to forcing by a sequence of periodic earthquakes. Earthquake cycle models with a weak midcrustal layer exhibit substantially more near-fault preseismic strain localization than do classic two-layer models at short (<100 yr) Maxwell times. We apply both this three-layer model and the classic two-layer model to geodetic observations before and after the 1997 (M_W = 7.6) Manyi and 2001 (M_W = 7.8) Kokoxili strike-slip earthquakes in Tibet to estimate the viscosity of the crust below a 20 km thick seismogenic layer. For these events, interseismic stress relaxation in a weak ((viscosity \leq10^{18.5} Pa⋅s)) and thin (height ≤20 km) midcrustal layer explains observations of both preseismic near-fault strain localization and rapid (>50 mm/yr) postseismic velocities in the years following the coseismic ruptures. We suggest that earthquake cycle models with a localized midcrustal layer can simultaneously explain both preseismic and postseismic geodetic observations with a single Maxwell viscosity, while the classic two-layer model requires a rheology with multiple relaxation time scales.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

earthquake cycle, post-seismic, mid-crustal strength, strain localization

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories