Publication:
Economic game theory for mutualism and cooperation

Thumbnail Image

Date

2011

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Archetti, Marco, István Scheuring, Moshe Hoffman, Megan E. Frederickson, Naomi E. Pierce, and Douglas W. Yu. 2011. “Economic Game Theory for Mutualism and Cooperation.” Ecology Letters 14 (12) (October 20): 1300–1312. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01697.x.

Research Data

Abstract

We review recent work at the interface of economic game theory and evolutionary biology that provides new insights into the evolution of partner choice, host sanctions, partner fidelity feedback and public goods. (1) The theory of games with asymmetrical information shows that the right incentives allow hosts to screen-out parasites and screen-in mutualists, explaining successful partner choice in the absence of signalling. Applications range from ant-plants to microbiomes. (2) Contract theory distinguishes two longstanding but weakly differentiated explanations of host response to defectors: host sanctions and partner fidelity feedback. Host traits that selectively punish misbehaving symbionts are parsimoniously interpreted as pre-adaptations. Yucca-moth and legume-rhizobia mutualisms are argued to be examples of partner fidelity feedback. (3) The theory of public goods shows that cooperation in multi-player interactions can evolve in the absence of assortment, in one-shot social dilemmas among non-kin. Applications include alarm calls in vertebrates and exoenzymes in microbes.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Coevolution, common-pool resource, cooperation, game theory, host sanctions, mutualism, N-person prisoner’s dilemma, public goods, symbiosis, volunteer’s dilemma

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories