Publication: Self-Defeating Proposals: Ackerman on Emergency Powers
Date
2006
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Fordham Law Review
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Adrian Vermeule, Self-Defeating Proposals: Ackerman on Emergency Powers, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 631 (2006).
Research Data
Abstract
This paper responds to Bruce Ackerman's recent book on emergency powers (After the Next Attack: Emergency Powers in an Age of Terrorism). Ackerman stumbles into a methodological pitfall by offering a self-defeating proposal: the diagnosis that Ackerman offers itself rules out the prescription that he suggests. Proposals defeat themselves when the motives, beliefs or political opportunities ascribed to relevant actors by the theorist's diagnosis are incompatible with the solution that the theorist offers. The value of the book, then, is that it provides a methodological cautionary tale.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only