Publication:
Self-Defeating Proposals: Ackerman on Emergency Powers

Thumbnail Image

Date

2006

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Fordham Law Review
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Adrian Vermeule, Self-Defeating Proposals: Ackerman on Emergency Powers, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 631 (2006).

Research Data

Abstract

This paper responds to Bruce Ackerman's recent book on emergency powers (After the Next Attack: Emergency Powers in an Age of Terrorism). Ackerman stumbles into a methodological pitfall by offering a self-defeating proposal: the diagnosis that Ackerman offers itself rules out the prescription that he suggests. Proposals defeat themselves when the motives, beliefs or political opportunities ascribed to relevant actors by the theorist's diagnosis are incompatible with the solution that the theorist offers. The value of the book, then, is that it provides a methodological cautionary tale.

Description

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories