Publication:
Symposium: Brown v. Board of Education and Its Legacy: A Tribute to Justice Thurgood Marshall, Public Law Litigation and the Ambiguties of Brown

Thumbnail Image

Date

1992

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Fordham Law Review
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Mark Tushnet, Symposium: Brown v. Board of Education and Its Legacy: A Tribute to Justice Thurgood Marshall, Public Law Litigation and the Ambiguties of Brown, 61 Fordham L. Rev. 23 (1992).

Research Data

Abstract

Professor Tushnet posits that the Supreme Court's concern for gradually carrying out desegregation in the public schools ironically gave rise to "'public law litigation"---an aggressive form ofjudicial review. Specifically. Professor Tushnet argues that the "all deliberate speed" standard, which separated the right from the remedy, enabled the courts to become a more powerful institution in shaping social policy. Throughout his speech, Professor Tushnet provides insight into the thought processes of the Supreme Court justices at the time of the Brown decision.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories