Publication: Symposium: Brown v. Board of Education and Its Legacy: A Tribute to Justice Thurgood Marshall, Public Law Litigation and the Ambiguties of Brown
Date
1992
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Fordham Law Review
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Mark Tushnet, Symposium: Brown v. Board of Education and Its Legacy: A Tribute to Justice Thurgood Marshall, Public Law Litigation and the Ambiguties of Brown, 61 Fordham L. Rev. 23 (1992).
Research Data
Abstract
Professor Tushnet posits that the Supreme Court's concern for gradually carrying out desegregation in the public schools ironically gave rise to "'public law litigation"---an aggressive form ofjudicial review. Specifically. Professor Tushnet argues that the "all deliberate speed" standard, which separated the right from the remedy, enabled the courts to become a more powerful institution in shaping social policy. Throughout his speech, Professor Tushnet provides insight into the thought processes of the Supreme Court justices at the time of the Brown decision.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only