Publication:

Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Glotzbecker, Michael P., Sumeet Garg, Behrooz A. Akbarnia, Michael Vitale, Tricia St Hillaire, and Ajeya Joshi. 2014. “Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures.” Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 8 (3): 245-250. doi:10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1.

Abstract

Purpose The rate of infection in patients having growth sparing surgery for early onset scoliosis has been reported up to 25 % during the course of treatment. A recent study demonstrated significant variability in the approach to infection prevention in adolescent and neuromuscular scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to conduct a similar survey in order to understand approaches used by experienced pediatric spinal surgeons with regard to infection prevention in growth friendly spinal procedures. Materials and methods After preliminary internal testing of a survey by the authors, a final 21-question survey was created and approved by the authors and electronically distributed to all members of the Chest Wall Spinal Deformity Study Group and the Growing Spine Study Group (n = 57). A total of 40 responses were obtained (70 %). Results: Significant variability in practice was demonstrated across the majority of the questions answered. Several of the questions demonstrated relative equipoise between practices, including preoperative MRSA screening, preoperative chlorhexidine baths, postoperative antibiotic duration after insertion, use of topical antibiotics, use of drains, use of IV gram negative coverage or vancomycin, and skin preparation. Conclusion: Other studies have demonstrated that variability in practice may have a negative impact on clinical outcomes, so one could postulate that steps that can reduce variability in the current population may help improve outcomes in this population. Areas of clinical equipoise can be used to help design and direct multicenter studies with an ultimate goal of reducing infections in this population. Level of evidence Level V. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Spinal infection, Growth friendly surgery, Early onset scoliosis, Infection prevention, Infection reduction

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories