Publication: Cost-Effectiveness of Genotype Testing for Primary Resistance in Brazil
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Luz, P. M., B. L. Morris, B. Grinsztejn, K. A. Freedberg, V. G. Veloso, R. P. Walensky, E. Losina, et al. 2014. “Cost-Effectiveness of Genotype Testing for Primary Resistance in Brazil.” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999) 68 (2): 152-161. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000426.
Research Data
Abstract
Objective: HIV genotype-resistance testing can help identify more effective antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens for patients, substantially increasing the likelihood of viral suppression and immune recovery. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of genotype-resistance testing before first-line ART initiation in Brazil. Design: We used a previously published microsimulation model of HIV disease (CEPAC-International) and data from Brazil to compare the clinical impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness of initial genotype testing (Genotype) with no initial genotype testing (No genotype). Methods: Model parameters were derived from the HIV Clinical Cohort at the Evandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute and from published data, using Brazilian sources whenever possible. Baseline patient characteristics included 69% male, mean age of 36 years (SD, 10 years), mean CD4 count of 347 per microliter (SD, 300/µL) at ART initiation, annual ART costs from 2012 US $1400 to US $13,400, genotype test cost of US $230, and primary resistance prevalence of 4.4%. Life expectancy and costs were discounted 3% per year. Genotype was defined as “cost-effective” compared with No Genotype if its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than 3 times the 2012 Brazilian per capita GDP of US $12,300. Results: Compared with No genotype, Genotype increased life expectancy from 18.45 to 18.47 years and reduced lifetime cost from US $45,000 to $44,770; thus, in the base case, Genotype was cost saving. Genotype was cost-effective at primary resistance prevalence as low as 1.4% and remained cost-effective when subsequent-line ART costs decreased to 30% of baseline value. Cost-inefficient results were observed only when simultaneously holding multiple parameters to extremes of their plausible ranges. Conclusions: Genotype-resistance testing in ART-naive individuals in Brazil will improve survival and decrease costs and should be incorporated into HIV treatment guidelines in Brazil.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
genotype, cost-effectiveness, Brazil, HIV, drug resistance
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service