Publication:
Niche incumbency, dispersal limitation and climate shape geographical distributions in a species-rich island adaptive radiation

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Algar, Adam C., D. Luke Mahler, Richard E. Glor, and Jonathan B. Losos. 2012. “Niche Incumbency, Dispersal Limitation and Climate Shape Geographical Distributions in a Species-Rich Island Adaptive Radiation.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 22, no. 4: 391–402.

Research Data

Abstract

Aim: To test the role of climate, dispersal limitation and biotic interactions in limiting species' distributions within an island adaptive radiation by integrating species traits, phylogeny and estimates of dispersal cost into climate-based species distribution models. Location: Hispaniola. Methods: Focusing on 26 species of Anolis lizards, we used multivariate adaptive regression splines to evaluate the contribution of climate, species interactions, phylogenetic history and dispersal limitation to species distributional limits. For each species, we mapped the morphological similarity of congenerics using traits of known ecological import and predicted that species would be less likely to occur in climatically suitable areas if they were inhabited by ecologically similar species. Dispersal limitation was incorporated by generating spatially explicit estimates of dispersal cost, based on inferred habitat suitability. We compared models including morphological similarity, dispersal cost, phylogeny and climate with climate-only models. Results were evaluated against a null model that conserved the spatial structure of species occurrences. Results: Climate had a dominant role in shaping species distributions. However, for over one-third of species we also found evidence consistent with supplemental effects of species interactions, i.e. ecological niche incumbency. These species were less likely to occur in climatically suitable areas inhabited by a morphologically similar species. Dispersal limitation also supplemented climatic limits in most species. These results were robust to co-variation with phylogeny and to comparison with our null model. Conclusions: These results suggest that, rather than act as mutually exclusive alternatives, multiple dimensions of the ecological niche, including climatic limits, biotic interactions and dispersal capacity, interact to shape species distributions and that local interactions can influence the broad-scale geography of species in a predictable way.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Anolis, biotic interactions, competitive exclusion, dispersal barriers, ecological niche, lizards, range limits, realized niche, species distribution modelling, trait-based ecology

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories