Publication:
Statistical normalization techniques for magnetic resonance imaging☆☆☆

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Shinohara, Russell T., Elizabeth M. Sweeney, Jeff Goldsmith, Navid Shiee, Farrah J. Mateen, Peter A. Calabresi, Samson Jarso, Dzung L. Pham, Daniel S. Reich, and Ciprian M. Crainiceanu. 2014. “Statistical normalization techniques for magnetic resonance imaging☆☆☆.” NeuroImage : Clinical 6 (1): 9-19. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.008.

Research Data

Abstract

While computed tomography and other imaging techniques are measured in absolute units with physical meaning, magnetic resonance images are expressed in arbitrary units that are difficult to interpret and differ between study visits and subjects. Much work in the image processing literature on intensity normalization has focused on histogram matching and other histogram mapping techniques, with little emphasis on normalizing images to have biologically interpretable units. Furthermore, there are no formalized principles or goals for the crucial comparability of image intensities within and across subjects. To address this, we propose a set of criteria necessary for the normalization of images. We further propose simple and robust biologically motivated normalization techniques for multisequence brain imaging that have the same interpretation across acquisitions and satisfy the proposed criteria. We compare the performance of different normalization methods in thousands of images of patients with Alzheimer's disease, hundreds of patients with multiple sclerosis, and hundreds of healthy subjects obtained in several different studies at dozens of imaging centers.

Description

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging, Normalization, Statistics, Image analysis

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories