DASH
Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Browse DASH
DASH Stories
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Harvard Medical School
  3. HMS Scholarly Articles
  4. The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine

The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine

Open/View files
3833211.pdf (381.09 KB)
Date
2013
Author(s)
Harshman, L C
Fougeray, R
Choueiri, T K
Schutz, F A
Salhi, Y
Rosenberg, J E
Bellmunt, J
DOI
10.1038/bjc.2013.617
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Harshman, L C, R Fougeray, T K Choueiri, F A Schutz, Y Salhi, J E Rosenberg, and J Bellmunt. 2013. “The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine.” British Journal of Cancer 109 (10): 2548-2553. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.617.
Abstract
Background: A phase III trial demonstrated an overall survival advantage with the addition of vinflunine to best supportive care (BSC) in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial cancer. We subsequently examined the impact of an additional 2 years of survival follow-up and evaluated the influence of first-line platinum therapy on survival. Methods: The 357 eligible patients from the phase III study were categorised into two cohorts depending on prior cisplatin treatment: cisplatin or non-cisplatin. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The majority had received prior cisplatin (70.3%). Survival was higher in the cisplatin group (HR: 0.76; CI 95% 0.58–0.99; P=0.04) irrespective of treatment arm. Multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors (liver involvement, haemoglobin, performance status) and prior platinum administration did not show an independent effect of cisplatin. Vinflunine reduced the risk of death by 24% in the cisplatin-group (HR: 0.76; CI 95% 0.58–0.99; P=0.04) and by 35% in non-cisplatin patients (HR: 0.65; CI 95% 0.41–1.04; P=0.07). Interpretation: Differences in prognostic factors between patients who can receive prior cisplatin and those who cannot may explain the survival differences in patients who undergo second line therapy. Prior cisplatin administration did not diminish the subsequent benefit of vinflunine over BSC.
Other Available Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833211/pdf/
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
URI
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13454818
Subjects

vinflunine

urothelial cancer

cisplatin

platinum

survival

Collection
HMS Scholarly Articles
Metrics
Repository logo
  • CONTACT US
  • OSRDS
  • ABOUT DASH
  • DEPOSITING TO DASH
  • TERMS OF USE
  • REQUEST A WAIVER
  • TAKE DOWN POLICY
  • NAME CHANGE POLICY
  • HARVARD OA POLICIES
  • DASH SUBMITTER AGREEMENT
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
Creative Commons License BY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given.
For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy
©2024 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.