Publication: Maximizing Clinical Research Participation in Vulnerable Older Persons: Identification of Barriers and Motivators
Date
2008
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Marcantonio, Edward R., Jasneet Aneja, Richard N. Jones, David C. Alsop, Tamara G. Fong, Gregory J. Crosby, Deborah J. Culley, L. Adrienne Cupples, and Sharon K. Inouye. 2008. “Maximizing Clinical Research Participation in Vulnerable Older Persons: Identification of Barriers and Motivators.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56 (8) (August): 1522–1527. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01829.x.
Research Data
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To identify barriers and motivators to participation in long-term clinical research by high-risk elderly people and to develop procedures to maximize recruitment and retention.
DESIGN:
Quantitative and qualitative survey.
SETTING:
Academic primary care medicine and pre-anesthesia testing clinics.
PARTICIPANTS:
Fifty patients aged 70 and older, including 25 medical patients at high risk of hospitalization and 25 patients with planned major surgery.
MEASUREMENTS:
Fifteen- to 20-minute interviews involved open- and closed-ended questions guided by an in-depth script. Two planned study protocols were presented to each participant. Both involved serial neuropsychological assessments, blood testing, and magnetic resonance brain imaging (MRI); one added lumbar puncture (LP). Participants were asked whether they would be willing to participate in these protocols, rated barriers and incentives to participation, and were probed with open-ended questions.
RESULTS:
Of 50 participants (average age 78, 44% male, 40% nonwhite), 32 (64%) expressed willingness to participate in the LP-containing protocol, with LP cited as the strongest disincentive. Thirty-eight (76%) expressed willingness to participate in the protocol without LP, with phlebotomy and long interviews cited as the strongest disincentives. Altruism was a strong motivator for participation, whereas transportation was a major barrier. Study visits at home, flexible appointment times, assessments shorter than 75 minutes, and providing transportation and free parking were strategies developed to maximize study participation.
CONCLUSION:
Vulnerable elderly people expressed a high rate of willingness to participate in an 18-month prospective study. Participants identified incentives and barriers that enabled investigators to develop procedures to maximize recruitment and retention.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
clinical trials, clinical research, elders, recruitment, retention
Terms of Use
Metadata Only