Publication: A statistically robust EEG re-referencing procedure to mitigate reference effect
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Lepage, Kyle Q., Mark A. Kramer, and Catherine J. Chu. 2014. “A Statistically Robust EEG Re-Referencing Procedure to Mitigate Reference Effect.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 235 (September): 101–116. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.05.008.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: The electroencephalogram (EEG) remains the primary tool for diagnosis of abnormal brain activity in clinical neurology and for in vivo recordings of human neurophysiology in neuroscience research. In EEG data acquisition, voltage is measured at positions on the scalp with respect to a reference electrode. When this reference electrode responds to electrical activity or artifact all electrodes are affected. Successful analysis of EEG data often involves re-referencing procedures that modify the recorded traces and seek to minimize the impact of reference electrode activity upon functions of the original EEG recordings.
New method: We provide a novel, statistically robust procedure that adapts a robust maximum-likelihood type estimator to the problem of reference estimation, reduces the influence of neural activity from the re-referencing operation, and maintains good performance in a wide variety of empirical scenarios.
Results: The performance of the proposed and existing re-referencing procedures are validated in simulation and with examples of EEG recordings. To facilitate this comparison, channel-to-channel correlations are investigated theoretically and in simulation.
Comparison with existing methods: The proposed procedure avoids using data contaminated by neural signal and remains unbiased in recording scenarios where physical references, the common average reference (CAR) and the reference estimation standardization technique (REST) are not optimal.
Conclusion:The proposed procedure is simple, fast, and avoids the potential for substantial bias when analyzing low-density EEG data.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service