Publication:

Will PM control undermine China’s efforts to reduce soil acidification?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2011

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Zhao, Yu, Lei Duan, Yu Lei, Jia Xing, Chris P. Nielsen, and Jiming Hao. 2011. “Will PM Control Undermine China’s Efforts to Reduce Soil Acidification?” Environmental Pollution 159 (10) (October): 2726–2732. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.018.

Abstract

China’s strategies to control acidifying pollutants and particulate matter (PM) may be in conflict for soil acidification abatement. Acidifying pollutant emissions are estimated for 2005 and 2020 with anticipated control policies. PM emissions including base cations (BCs) are evaluated with two scenarios, a base case applying existing policy to 2020, and a control case including anticipated tightened measures. Depositions of sulfur (S), nitrogen (N) and BCs are simulated and their acidification risks are evaluated with critical load (CL). In 2005, the area exceeding CL covered 15.6% of mainland China, with total exceedance of 2.2 Mt S. These values decrease in the base scenario 2020, implying partial recovery from acidification. Under more realistic PM control, the respective estimates are 17.9% and 2.4 Mt S, indicating increased acidification risks due to abatement of acid-neutralizing BCs. China’s anthropogenic PM abatement will have potentially stronger chemical implications for acidification than developed countries.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Soil acidification, Anthropogenic PM, Critical load, Multipollutant

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories