Publication: Interventions to Improve Adherence and Persistence With Osteoporosis Medications: A Systematic Literature Review
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2009-06-05
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science + Business Media
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Gleeson, T., M. D. Iversen, J. Avorn, A. M. Brookhart, J. N. Katz, E. Losina, F. May, A. R. Patrick, W. H. Shrank, and D. H. Solomon. 2009. Interventions to Improve Adherence and Persistence with Osteoporosis Medications: a Systematic Literature Review. Osteoporos Int 20, no. 12: 2127–2134. doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0976-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0976-0.
Research Data
Abstract
Summary: Adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications are poor. We conducted a systematic literature review of interventions to improve adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications. Seven studies met eligibility requirements and were included in the review. Few interventions were efficacious, and no clear trends regarding successful intervention techniques were identified. However, periodic follow-up interaction between patients and health professionals appeared to be beneficial. Introduction: Adherence and persistence with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis are suboptimal. Our goal was to examine the design and efficacy of published interventions to improve adherence and persistence. Methods: We searched medical literature databases for English-language papers published between January 1990 and July 2008. We selected papers that described interventions and provided results for control and intervention subjects. We assessed the design and methods of each study, including randomization, blinding, and reporting of drop-outs. We summarized the results and calculated effect sizes for each trial. Results: Seven studies met eligibility requirements and were included in the review. Five of the seven studies provided adherence data. Of those five studies, three showed a statistically significant (p≤0.05) improvement in adherence by the intervention group, with effect sizes from 0.17 to 0.58. Five of the seven studies provided persistence data. Of those five, one reported statistically significant improvement in persistence by the intervention group, with an effect size of 0.36. Conclusions: Few interventions were efficacious, and no clear trends regarding successful intervention techniques were identified in this small sample of studies. However, periodic follow-up interaction between patients and health professionals appeared to be beneficial.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
adherence, compliance, intervention, medication, motivational interviewing, osteoporosis, persistence, systematic review
Terms of Use
Metadata Only