Publication:
Characteristics of Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The Impact of Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Volume

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Park, Mi Young, Robert K. Altman, Mary Orencole, Prabhat Kumar, Kimberly A. Parks, Kevin E. Heist, Jagmeet P. Singh, and Michael H. Picard. 2012. “Characteristics of Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The Impact of Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Volume.” Clinical Cardiology 35 (12) (August 9): 779–780. doi:10.1002/clc.22043.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: One third of patients who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are classified as nonresponders. Characteristics of responders to CRT have been studied in multiple clinical trials. Hypothesis: We aimed to examine characteristics of CRT responders in a routine clinical practice. Method: One hundred and twenty five patients were examined retrospectively from a multidisciplinary CRT clinic program. Echocardiographic CRT response was defined as a decrease in left ventricular (LV) end systolic volume (ESV) of ≥ 15% and/or absolute increase of 5% in LV ejection fraction (EF) at 6 month visit. Results: There were 81 responders and 44 nonresponders. By univariate analyses, female gender, nonischemic cardiomyopathy etiology, baseline QRS duration, the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index predicted CRT response. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated only QRS duration, LBBB and LVEDV index were independent predictors (QRS width: Odd ratio [OR] 1.027, 95% CI 1.004 – 1.050, p = 0.023; LBBB: OR 3.568, 95% CI 1.284 – 9.910, p=0.015; LV EDV index: OR 0.970, 95% CI 0.953 – 0.987, p= 0.001). While female gender and nonischemic etiology were associated with an improved CRT response on univariate analyses, after adjusting for LV volumes, they were not independent predictors. Conclusion: QRS width, LBBB and LVEDV index are independent predictors for echocardiographic CRT response. Previously reported differences in CRT response for gender and cardiomyopathy etiology are associated with differences in baseline LV volumes in our clinical practice.

Description

Keywords

cardiac resynchronization therapy, predictor to CRT response, left ventricular volume

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories