Publication: The Policy Argument for Healthcare Workforce Diversity
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Nature
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Mensah, Michael O., and Benjamin D. Sommers. 2016. “The Policy Argument for Healthcare Workforce Diversity.” Journal of General Internal Medicine (July 18). doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3784-1.
Research Data
Abstract
This perspectives article considers the potential implications an affirmative action ban would have on patient care in the US. A physician’s race and ethnicity are among the strongest predictors of specialty choice and whether or not a physician cares for Medicaid and uninsured populations. Taking this into account, research suggests that an affirmative action ban in university admissions would sharply reduce the supply of primary care physicians to Medicaid and uninsured populations over the coming decade. Our article compares current conditions to the potential effect of an affirmative action ban by projecting how many future medical students will become primary care physicians for Medicaid and uninsured patients by 2025. Based on previous evidence and current medical student training patterns, we project that a ban could deny primary care access for 1.25 million of our nation’s most vulnerable patients, considerably worsening existing healthcare disparities. More broadly, we argue that the effects of eliminating affirmative action would be fundamentally contrary to the Association of American Medical Colleges’ stated goal of medical education—“to improve the health of all.”
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
affirmative action, medical school admissions, underserved care, primary care, health disparities
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service