Publication: PrEP implementation: moving from trials to policy and practice
Open/View Files
Date
2015
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International AIDS Society
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Cáceres, Carlos F, Kevin R O'Reilly, Kenneth H Mayer, and Rachel Baggaley. 2015. “PrEP implementation: moving from trials to policy and practice.” Journal of the International AIDS Society 18 (4Suppl 3): 20222. doi:10.7448/IAS.18.4.20222. http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.4.20222.
Research Data
Abstract
Introduction: It is increasingly clear that the HIV response will not be sustainable if the number of infections is not significantly reduced. Discussion For two decades, research has been ongoing to identify new behavioural and biomedical strategies to prevent HIV infection. In the past few years, the efficacy of several new strategies has been demonstrated, including oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP; i.e. daily use of tenofovir/emtricitabine). Because several social, political and logistic barriers remain, however, optimal PrEP implementation will require a better dissemination of new evidence in a number of areas and additional implementation research from various disciplinary perspectives (i.e. social science, policy and ethics; health systems; and economics, including cost-effectiveness studies). Discussion of new evidence on those topics, as well as case studies of potential PrEP implementation in diverse environments, can improve the understanding of the role that PrEP may play in addressing the global HIV/AIDS epidemic. In light of these needs, the Network for Multidisciplinary Studies in ARV-based HIV Prevention (NEMUS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) were honoured to co-organize a special issue of JIAS aimed at contributing to a scholarly discussion of current conditions surrounding PrEP implementation, potential impact and efficiency, social science concerns and the study of PrEP implementation in specific country cases. The papers included in this monograph identify and cover many of the main aspects of the complex yet promising discussions around PrEP implementation today. Conclusions: This is a collection of timely contributions from global leaders in HIV research and policy that addresses geographic diversity, uses a trans-disciplinary approach and covers a variety of the complex issues raised by PrEP. As this publication will become accessible to all, we hope that it will remain a valuable resource for policy makers, programme managers, researchers and activists around the world at a moment of a paradigm shift of the global response to HIV.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Editorial, HIV, PrEP, key populations, scale-up, implementation science
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service