Publication:

Cellular Interrogation: Exploiting Cell-to-Cell Variability to Discriminate Regulatory Mechanisms in Oscillatory Signalling

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Estrada, Javier, Natalie Andrew, Daniel Gibson, Frederick Chang, Florian Gnad, and Jeremy Gunawardena. 2016. “Cellular Interrogation: Exploiting Cell-to-Cell Variability to Discriminate Regulatory Mechanisms in Oscillatory Signalling.” PLoS Computational Biology 12 (7): e1004995. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004995.

Research Data

Abstract

The molecular complexity within a cell may be seen as an evolutionary response to the external complexity of the cell’s environment. This suggests that the external environment may be harnessed to interrogate the cell’s internal molecular architecture. Cells, however, are not only nonlinear and non-stationary, but also exhibit heterogeneous responses within a clonal, isogenic population. In effect, each cell undertakes its own experiment. Here, we develop a method of cellular interrogation using programmable microfluidic devices which exploits the additional information present in cell-to-cell variation, without requiring model parameters to be fitted to data. We focussed on Ca2+ signalling in response to hormone stimulation, which exhibits oscillatory spiking in many cell types and chose eight models of Ca2+ signalling networks which exhibit similar behaviour in simulation. We developed a nonlinear frequency analysis for non-stationary responses, which could classify models into groups under parameter variation, but found that this question alone was unable to distinguish critical feedback loops. We further developed a nonlinear amplitude analysis and found that the combination of both questions ruled out six of the models as inconsistent with the experimentally-observed dynamics and heterogeneity. The two models that survived the double interrogation were mathematically different but schematically identical and yielded the same unexpected predictions that we confirmed experimentally. Further analysis showed that subtle mathematical details can markedly influence non-stationary responses under parameter variation, emphasising the difficulty of finding a “correct” model. By developing questions for the pathway being studied, and designing more versatile microfluidics, cellular interrogation holds promise as a systematic strategy that can complement direct intervention by genetics or pharmacology.

Description

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Biochemistry, Neurochemistry, Neurotransmitters, Biogenic Amines, Histamine, Neuroscience, Physical Sciences, Chemistry, Chemical Compounds, Organic Compounds, Organic Chemistry, Engineering and Technology, Fluidics, Microfluidics, Mathematical and Statistical Techniques, Mathematical Models, Signal Processing, Simulation and Modeling, Biological cultures, Cell lines, HeLa cells, Cell cultures, Cultured tumor cells, Physics, Classical Mechanics, Continuum Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics, Fluid Dynamics, Fluid Flow, Cell Biology, Signal Transduction, Cell Signaling, Calcium Signaling

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories