Publication:
Project Gel a Randomized Rectal Microbicide Safety and Acceptability Study in Young Men and Transgender Women

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

McGowan, I., R. D. Cranston, K. H. Mayer, I. Febo, K. Duffill, A. Siegel, J. C. Engstrom, et al. 2016. “Project Gel a Randomized Rectal Microbicide Safety and Acceptability Study in Young Men and Transgender Women.” PLoS ONE 11 (6): e0158310. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158310.

Research Data

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of Project Gel was to determine the safety and acceptability of rectal microbicides in young men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) at risk of HIV infection. Methods: MSM and TGW aged 18–30 years were enrolled at three sites; Pittsburgh, PA; Boston, MA; and San Juan, PR. Stage 1A was a cross-sectional assessment of sexual health and behavior in MSM and TGW. A subset of participants from Stage 1A were then enrolled in Stage 1B, a 12-week evaluation of the safety and acceptability of a placebo rectal gel. This was followed by the final phase of the study (Stage 2) in which a subset of participants from Stage 1B were enrolled into a Phase 1 rectal safety and acceptability evaluation of tenofovir (TFV) 1% gel. Results: 248 participants were enrolled into Stage 1A. Participants’ average age was 23.3 years. The most common sexually transmitted infection (STIs) at baseline were Herpes simplex (HSV)-2 (16.1% by serology) and rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) (10.1% by NAAT). 134 participants were enrolled into Stage 1B. During the 12 week period of follow-up 2 HIV, 5 rectal CT, and 5 rectal Neisseria gonorrhea infections were detected. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were infections (N = 56) or gastrointestinal (N = 46) and were mild (69.6%) or moderate (28.0%). Of the participants who completed Stage 1B, 24 were enrolled into Stage 2 and randomized (1:1) to receive TFV or placebo gel. All participants completed Stage 2. The majority of AEs were gastrointestinal (N = 10) and of mild (87.2%) or moderate (10.3%) severity. Conclusions: In this study we were able to enroll a sexually active population of young MSM and TGW who were willing to use rectal microbicides. TFV gel was safe and acceptable and should be further developed as an alternative HIV prevention intervention for this population. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01283360

Description

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Microbiology, Microbial Control, Microbicides, People and Places, Population Groupings, Sexual Preferences, Men WHO Have Sex with Men, Medicine and Health Sciences, Infectious Diseases, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Medicine and health sciences, Infectious diseases, Viral diseases, HIV infections, Public and occupational health, Preventive medicine, HIV prevention, Professions, Sex Workers, Medical Microbiology, Microbial Pathogens, Viral Pathogens, Immunodeficiency Viruses, HIV, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pathogens, Organisms, Viruses, Biology and life sciences, RNA viruses, Retroviruses, Lentivirus, Clinical Research Design, Adverse Events

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories