Publication:

Adherence to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in a Clinical Setting

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Montgomery, Madeline C., Catherine E. Oldenburg, Amy S. Nunn, Leandro Mena, Peter Anderson, Teri Liegler, Kenneth H. Mayer, Rupa Patel, Alexi Almonte, and Philip A. Chan. 2016. “Adherence to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in a Clinical Setting.” PLoS ONE 11 (6): e0157742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157742.

Abstract

Background: The HIV epidemic in the United States (US) disproportionately affects gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using co-formulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing HIV incidence among MSM. However, low adherence was reported in major efficacy trials and may present a substantial barrier to successful PrEP implementation. Rates of adherence to PrEP in “real-world” clinical settings in the US remain largely unknown. Methods: We reviewed demographic and clinical data for the first 50 patients to enroll in a clinical PrEP program in Providence, Rhode Island. We analyzed self-reported drug adherence as well as drug concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS) from patients who attended either a three- or six-month follow-up appointment. We further assessed drug concentrations and the resistance profile of a single patient who seroconverted while taking PrEP. Results: Of the first 50 patients to be prescribed PrEP, 62% attended a follow-up appointment at three months and 38% at six months. Of those who attended an appointment at either time point (70%, n = 35), 92% and 95% reported taking ±4 doses/week at three and six months, respectively. Drug concentrations were performed on a random sample of 20 of the 35 patients who attended a follow-up appointment. TDF levels consistent with ±4 doses/week were found in 90% of these patients. There was a significant correlation between self-reported adherence and drug concentrations (r = 0.49, p = 0.02). One patient who had been prescribed PrEP seroconverted at his three-month follow-up visit. The patient’s drug concentrations were consistent with daily dosing. Population sequencing and ultrasensitive allele-specific PCR detected the M184V mutation, but no other TDF- or FTC-associated mutations, including those present as minor variants. Conclusion: In this clinical PrEP program, adherence was high, and self-reported drug adherence accurately reflected drug concentrations as measured by DBS.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Biology and Life Sciences, Immunology, Vaccination and Immunization, Prophylaxis, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, Medicine and Health Sciences, Public and Occupational Health, Preventive Medicine, Pharmacology, Drug Adherence, Microbiology, Microbial Control, Antimicrobial Resistance, Medicine and health sciences, Public and occupational health, Preventive medicine, HIV prevention, Health Care, Patients, People and Places, Population Groupings, Sexual Preferences, Men WHO Have Sex with Men, Medical Microbiology, Microbial Pathogens, Viral Pathogens, Immunodeficiency Viruses, HIV, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pathogens, Organisms, Viruses, Biology and life sciences, RNA viruses, Retroviruses, Lentivirus, Infectious diseases, Viral diseases, HIV infections

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories