Publication: Commentary: Nash equilibrium and mechanism design
Open/View Files
Date
2011
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Maskin, Eric. 2011. “Commentary: Nash Equilibrium and Mechanism Design.” Games and Economic Behavior 71 (1) (January): 9–11. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.008.
Research Data
Abstract
A Nash equilibrium (called an “equilibrium point” by John Nash himself; see Nash 1950) of a game occurs when each player chooses a strategy from which unilateral deviations do not pay. The concept of Nash equilibrium is far and away Nash’s most important legacy to economics and the other behavioral sciences. This is because it remains the central solution concept—i.e., prediction of behavior—in applications of game theory to these fields. As I shall review below, Nash equilibrium has some important shortcomings, both theoretical and practical. I will argue, however, that these drawbacks are far less troublesome in problems of mechanism design than in many other applications of game theory.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service