Publication: Assessment of PaO2/FiO2 for stratification of patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
Open/View Files
Date
2015
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Villar, J., J. Blanco, R. del Campo, D. Andaluz-Ojeda, F. J. Díaz-Domínguez, A. Muriel, V. Córcoles, et al. 2015. “Assessment of PaO2/FiO2 for stratification of patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.” BMJ Open 5 (3): e006812. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006812.
Research Data
Abstract
Objectives: A recent update of the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) proposed an empirical classification based on ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) at ARDS onset. Since the proposal did not mandate PaO2/FiO2 calculation under standardised ventilator settings (SVS), we hypothesised that a stratification based on baseline PaO2/FiO2 would not provide accurate assessment of lung injury severity. Design: A prospective, multicentre, observational study. Setting: A network of teaching hospitals. Participants: 478 patients with eligible criteria for moderate (100<PaO2/FiO2≤200) and severe (PaO2/FiO2≤100) ARDS and followed until hospital discharge. Interventions We examined physiological and ventilator parameters in association with the PaO2/FiO2 at ARDS onset, after 24 h of usual care and at 24 h under a SVS. At 24 h, patients were reclassified as severe, moderate, mild (200<PaO2/FiO2≤300) ARDS and non-ARDS (PaO2/FiO2>300). Primary and secondary outcomes Group severity and hospital mortality. Results: At ARDS onset, 173 patients had a PaO2/FiO2≤100 but only 38.7% met criteria for severe ARDS at 24 h under SVS. When assessed under SVS, 61.3% of patients with severe ARDS were reclassified as moderate, mild and non-ARDS, while lung severity and hospital mortality changed markedly with every PaO2/FiO2 category (p<0.000001). Our model of risk stratification outperformed the stratification using baseline PaO2/FiO2 and non-standardised PaO2/FiO2 at 24 h, when analysed by the predictive receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: area under the ROC curve for stratification at baseline was 0.583 (95% CI 0.525 to 0.636), 0.605 (95% CI 0.552 to 0.658) at 24 h without SVS and 0.693 (95% CI 0.645 to 0.742) at 24 h under SVS (p<0.000001). Conclusions: Our findings support the need for patient assessment under SVS at 24 h after ARDS onset to assess disease severity, and have implications for the diagnosis and management of ARDS patients. Trial registration numbers NCT00435110 and NCT00736892.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine)
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service