Publication:
DNA copy number analysis of metastatic urothelial carcinoma with comparison to primary tumors

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2015

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Bambury, R. M., A. S. Bhatt, M. Riester, C. S. Pedamallu, F. Duke, J. Bellmunt, E. C. Stack, et al. 2015. “DNA copy number analysis of metastatic urothelial carcinoma with comparison to primary tumors.” BMC Cancer 15 (1): 242. doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: To date, there have been no reports characterizing the genome-wide somatic DNA chromosomal copy-number alteration landscape in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We sought to characterize the DNA copy-number profile in a cohort of metastatic samples and compare them to a cohort of primary urothelial carcinoma samples in order to identify changes that are associated with progression from primary to metastatic disease. Methods: Using molecular inversion probe array analysis we compared genome-wide chromosomal copy-number alterations between 30 metastatic and 29 primary UC samples. Whole transcriptome RNA-Seq analysis was also performed in primary and matched metastatic samples which was available for 9 patients. Results: Based on a focused analysis of 32 genes in which alterations may be clinically actionable, there were significantly more amplifications/deletions in metastases (8.6% vs 4.5%, p < 0.001). In particular, there was a higher frequency of E2F3 amplification in metastases (30% vs 7%, p = 0.046). Paired primary and metastatic tissue was available for 11 patients and 3 of these had amplifications of potential clinical relevance in metastases that were not in the primary tumor including ERBB2, CDK4, CCND1, E2F3, and AKT1. The transcriptional activity of these amplifications was supported by RNA expression data. Conclusions: The discordance in alterations between primary and metastatic tissue may be of clinical relevance in the era of genomically directed precision cancer medicine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories