Publication:
Dealing with noncompliance and missing outcomes in a randomized trial using Bayesian technology: Prevention of perinatal sepsis clinical trial, Soweto, South Africa

Thumbnail Image

Date

2010

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Rubin, Donald B., and Elizabeth R. Zell. 2010. Dealing with noncompliance and missing outcomes in a randomized trial using Bayesian technology: Prevention of perinatal sepsis clinical trial, Soweto, South Africa. Statistical Methodology 7, no. 3: 338–350. doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2009.10.001.

Research Data

Abstract

The success of interventions designed to address important issues in social and medical science is best addressed by randomized experiments. With human beings there are often complications, however, such as noncompliance and missing data. Such complications are often addressed by statistically invalid methods of analysis, in particular, intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Here we address these two complications using a statistically valid approach based on principal stratification with a fully Bayesian analysis. This analysis is applied to a randomized trial of a potentially important intervention designed to reduce the transmission of bacterial colonization between mothers and their infants through vaginal delivery in South Africa : the Prevention of Perinatal Sepsis (PoPs).

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

noncompliance, missing data, randomized trial, GBS, Bayesian methods

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories