Publication:
Testing treatment effects in unconfounded studies under model misspecification: Logistic regression, discretization, and their combination

Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Cangul, M. Z., Y. R. Chretien, R. Gutman, and D. B. Rubin. 2009. Testing Treatment effects in unconfounded studies under model misspecification: Logistic regression, discretization, and their combination. Statistics in Medicine 28, no. 20: 2531–2551. doi:10.1002/sim.3633.

Research Data

Abstract

Logistic regression is commonly used to test for treatment effects in observational studies. If the distribution of a continuous covariate differs between treated and control populations, logistic regression yields an invalid hypothesis test even in an uncounfounded study if the link is not logistic. This flaw is not corrected by the commonly used technique of discretizing the covariate into intervals. A valid test can be obtained by discretization followed by regression adjustment within each interval.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

observational studies, logistic regression, subclassification, treatment effect, discretization

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories