Publication:

Application Performance on the Direct Access File System

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2003

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Fedorova, Alexandra, Margo Seltzer, Kostas Magoutis, and Salimah Addetia. 2003. Application Performance on the Direct Access File System. Harvard Computer Science Group Technical Report TR-01-03.

Abstract

The Direct Access File System (DAFS) is a distributed file system built on top of direct-access transports (DAT). Direct-access transports are characterized by using remote direct memory access (RDMA) for data transfer and user-level networking. The motivation behind the DAT-enabled distributed file system architecture is the reduction of the CPU overhead on the I/O data path. In collaboration with Duke University we have created and made available an open-source implementation of DAFS for the FreeBSD platform. In this paper we describe a performance evaluation study of DAFS that was performed with this software. The goal of this work is to determine whether the architecture of DAFS brings any fundamental performance benefits to applications compared to traditional distributed file systems. In our study we compare DAFS to a version of NFS optimized to reduce the I/O overhead. We conclude that DAFS can accomplish superior performance for latency-sensitive applications, outperforming NFS by up to a factor of 2. Bandwidth-sensitive applications do equally well on both systems, unless they are CPU-intensive, in which case they perform better on DAFS. We also found that RDMA is a less restrictive mechanism to achieve copy avoidance than that used by the optimized NFS.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories