Publication:

The First 500 Registrations to the Research Registry®: Advancing Registration of Under-Registered Study Types

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2016

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Frontiers Media S.A.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Agha, Riaz, Alexander J. Fowler, Christopher Limb, Yasser Al Omran, Harkiran Sagoo, Kiron Koshy, Daniyal J. Jafree, Mohammed Omer Anwar, Peter McCullogh, and Dennis Paul Orgill. 2016. “The First 500 Registrations to the Research Registry®: Advancing Registration of Under-Registered Study Types.” Frontiers in Surgery 3 (1): 50. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2016.00050. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00050.

Abstract

Introduction: The Declaration of Helsinki 2013 encourages the registration of all research studies involving human participants. However, emphasis has been placed on prospective clinical trials, and it is estimated that only 10% of observational studies are registered. In response, Research Registry®1 was launched in February 2015; a retrospectively curated registry that is free and easy to use. Research Registry® enables prospective or retrospective registration of studies, including those study types that cannot be registered on existing registries. In this study, we describe the first 500 registrations on Research Registry®. Methods: Since the launch of Research Registry® in February 2015, data of registrations have been collected, including type of studies registered, country of origin, and data curation activity. Inappropriate registrations, such as duplicates, were identified by the data curation process. These were removed from the database or modified as required. A quality score was assigned for each registration, based on Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s criteria on what research studies should convey. Changes in quality scores over time were assessed. Results: A total of 500 studies were registered on Research Registry® from February 2015 to October 2015, with a total of 1.7 million patients enrolled. The most common study types were retrospective cohort studies (37.2%), case series (14.8%), and first-in-man case reports (10.4%). Registrations were received from 57 different countries; the most submissions were received from Turkey, followed by China and the United Kingdom. Retrospective data curation identified 80 studies that were initially registered as the incorrect study type, and were subsequently correct. The Kruskal–Wallis test identified a significant improvement in quality scores for registrations from February 2015 to October 2015 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Since its conception in February 2015, Research Registry® has established itself as a new registry that is free, easy to use, and enables the registration of various study types, including observational studies and first-in-man case reports. Going forward, our plan is to continue developing Research Registry® in line with user feedback and usability studies. We plan to further promote Research Registry® to advance the cause of registration of research, to increase compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki 2013.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Helsinki Declaration, evidence-based medicine, registration, research design, databases

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories