Publication:

Reserve and Reserve-building activities research: key challenges and future directions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Schwartz, Carolyn E., Bruce D. Rapkin, and Brian C. Healy. 2016. “Reserve and Reserve-building activities research: key challenges and future directions.” BMC Neuroscience 17 (1): 62. doi:10.1186/s12868-016-0297-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0297-0.

Abstract

Background: The concept of Cognitive Reserve has great appeal and has led to an interesting and important body of research. We believe, however, that it is unnecessarily limited by ‘habits’ of measurement, nomenclature, and intra-disciplinary thinking. Main body A broader, more comprehensive way of conceptualizing Reserve is proposed that invokes a broader measurement approach, nomenclature that uses specific terms embedded in a theoretical model, and crosses disciplines. Conclusion: Building on this comprehensive conceptualization, we will discuss fruitful directions for future research.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Reserve-building activities, Cognitive Reserve, Neurological Reserve, Resilience, Quality of life, Measurement, Nomenclature theory, Tipping point, Inter-disciplinary

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories