Publication: Reserve and Reserve-building activities research: key challenges and future directions
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Schwartz, Carolyn E., Bruce D. Rapkin, and Brian C. Healy. 2016. “Reserve and Reserve-building activities research: key challenges and future directions.” BMC Neuroscience 17 (1): 62. doi:10.1186/s12868-016-0297-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0297-0.
Abstract
Background: The concept of Cognitive Reserve has great appeal and has led to an interesting and important body of research. We believe, however, that it is unnecessarily limited by ‘habits’ of measurement, nomenclature, and intra-disciplinary thinking. Main body A broader, more comprehensive way of conceptualizing Reserve is proposed that invokes a broader measurement approach, nomenclature that uses specific terms embedded in a theoretical model, and crosses disciplines. Conclusion: Building on this comprehensive conceptualization, we will discuss fruitful directions for future research.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
Reserve-building activities, Cognitive Reserve, Neurological Reserve, Resilience, Quality of life, Measurement, Nomenclature theory, Tipping point, Inter-disciplinary
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service