Publication: Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Nakhimovsky, Sharon S., Andrea B. Feigl, Carlos Avila, Gael O’Sullivan, Elizabeth Macgregor-Skinner, and Mark Spranca. 2016. “Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.” PLoS ONE 11 (9): e0163358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163358.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), which can lead to weight gain, is rising in middle-income countries (MICs). Taxing SSBs may help address this challenge. Systematic reviews focused on high-income countries indicate that taxing SSBs may reduce SSB consumption. Responsiveness to price changes may differ in MICs, where governments are considering the tax. To help inform their policy decisions, this review compiles evidence from MICs, assessing post-tax price increases (objective 1), changes in demand for SSBs and other products, overall and by socio-economic groups (objective 2), and effects on overweight and obesity prevalence (objective 3). Methods and Findings: We conducted a systematic review on the effectiveness of SSB taxation in MICs (1990–2016) and identified nine studies from Brazil, Ecuador, India, Mexico, Peru, and South Africa. Estimates for own-price elasticity ranged from -0.6 to -1.2, and decreases in SSB consumption ranged from 5 to 39 kilojoules per person per day given a 10% increase in SSB prices. The review found that milk is a likely substitute, and foods prepared away from home, snacks, and candy are likely complements to SSBs. A quasi-experimental study and two modeling studies also found a negative relationship between SSB prices and obesity outcomes after accounting for substitution effects. Estimates are consistent despite variation in baseline obesity prevalence and per person per day consumption of SSBs across countries studied. Conclusions: The review indicates that taxing SSBs will increase the prices of SSBs, especially sugary soda, in markets with few producers. Taxing SSBs will also reduce net energy intake by enough to prevent further growth in obesity prevalence, but not to reduce population weight permanently. Additional research using better survey data and stronger study designs is needed to ascertain the long-term effectiveness of an SSB tax on obesity prevalence in MICs.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Social Sciences, Political Science, Public Policy, Taxes, Biology and Life Sciences, Physiology, Physiological Parameters, Body Weight, Obesity, Medicine and Health Sciences, Nutrition, Diet, Beverages, People and places, Geographical locations, North America, Mexico, Systematic Reviews, Body Mass Index, Mathematical and Statistical Techniques, Statistical Methods, Meta-Analysis, Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Statistics (Mathematics), People and Places, Geographical Locations, Asia, India
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service