DASH
Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Browse DASH
DASH Stories
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Arts and Sciences
  3. FAS Scholarly Articles
  4. To Punish or to Leave: Distinct Cognitive Processes Underlie Partner Control and Partner Choice Behaviors

To Punish or to Leave: Distinct Cognitive Processes Underlie Partner Control and Partner Choice Behaviors

Open/View files
4411127.pdf (190.16 KB)
Date
2015
Author(s)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0125193
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Martin, Justin W., and Fiery Cushman. 2015. “To Punish or to Leave: Distinct Cognitive Processes Underlie Partner Control and Partner Choice Behaviors.” PLoS ONE 10 (4): e0125193. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125193.
Abstract
When a cooperative partner defects, at least two types of response are available: Punishment, aimed at modifying behavior, and ostracism, aimed at avoiding further social interaction with the partner. These options, termed partner control and partner choice, have been distinguished at behavioral and evolutionary levels. However, little work has compared their cognitive bases. Do these disparate behaviors depend on common processes of moral evaluation? Specifically, we assess whether they show identical patterns of dependence on two key dimensions of moral evaluation: A person’s intentions, and the outcomes that they cause. We address this issue in a “trembling hand” economic game. In this game, an allocator divides a monetary stake between themselves and a responder based on a stochastic mechanism. This allows for dissociations between the allocator’s intent and the actual outcome. Responders were either given the opportunity to punish or reward the allocator (partner control) or to switch to a different partner for a subsequent round of play (partner choice). Our results suggest that partner control and partner choice behaviors are supported by distinct underlying cognitive processes: Partner control exhibits greater sensitivity to the outcomes a partner causes, while partner choice is influenced almost exclusively by a partner’s intentions. This cognitive dissociation can be understood in light of the unique adaptive functions of partner control and partner choice.
Other Available Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411127/pdf/
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
URI
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16120930
Collection
FAS Scholarly Articles
Metrics
Repository logo
  • CONTACT US
  • OSRDS
  • ABOUT DASH
  • DEPOSITING TO DASH
  • TERMS OF USE
  • REQUEST A WAIVER
  • TAKE DOWN POLICY
  • NAME CHANGE POLICY
  • HARVARD OA POLICIES
  • DASH SUBMITTER AGREEMENT
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
Creative Commons License BY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given.
For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy
©2024 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.