Publication:

Modeling the Cost Effectiveness of Neuroimaging-Based Treatment of Acute Wake-Up Stroke

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Pandya, Ankur, Ashley A. Eggman, Hooman Kamel, Ajay Gupta, Bruce R. Schackman, and Pina C. Sanelli. 2016. “Modeling the Cost Effectiveness of Neuroimaging-Based Treatment of Acute Wake-Up Stroke.” PLoS ONE 11 (2): e0148106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148106.

Abstract

Background: Thrombolytic treatment (tissue-type plasminogen activator [tPA]) is only recommended for acute ischemic stroke patients with stroke onset time <4.5 hours. tPA is not recommended when stroke onset time is unknown. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI mismatch information has been found to approximate stroke onset time with some accuracy. Therefore, we developed a micro-simulation model to project health outcomes and costs of MRI-based treatment decisions versus no treatment for acute wake-up stroke patients. Methods and Findings: The model assigned simulated patients a true stroke onset time from a specified probability distribution. DWI-FLAIR mismatch estimated stroke onset <4.5 hours with sensitivity and specificity of 0.62 and 0.78, respectively. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores reflected tPA treatment effectiveness accounting for patients’ true stroke onset time. Discounted lifetime costs and benefits (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) were projected for each strategy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for the MRI-based strategy in base-case and sensitivity analyses. With no treatment, 45.1% of simulated patients experienced a good stroke outcome (mRS score 0–1). Under the MRI-based strategy, in which 17.0% of all patients received tPA despite stroke onset times >4.5 hours, 46.3% experienced a good stroke outcome. Lifetime discounted QALYs and costs were 5.312 and $88,247 for the no treatment strategy and 5.342 and $90,869 for the MRI-based strategy, resulting in an ICER of $88,000/QALY. Results were sensitive to variations in patient- and provider-specific factors such as sleep duration, hospital travel and door-to-needle times, as well as onset probability distribution, MRI specificity, and mRS utility values. Conclusions: Our model-based findings suggest that an MRI-based treatment strategy for this population could be cost-effective and quantifies the impact that patient- and provider-specific factors, such as sleep duration, hospital travel and door-to-needle times, could have on the optimal decision for wake-up stroke patients.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Medicine and Health Sciences, Neurology, Cerebrovascular Diseases, Stroke, Vascular Medicine, Diagnostic Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Imaging Techniques, Radiology and Imaging, Ischemic Stroke, Biology and Life Sciences, Physiology, Physiological Processes, Sleep, Social Sciences, Economics, Economic Analysis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Probability Theory, Probability Distribution, Health Care, Health Care Policy, Treatment Guidelines, Neuroimaging, Neuroscience

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories