Publication:

Tin Lizzie Dreams: Henry Ford and Antimodern American Culture, 1919-1942

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2015-05-06

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Hatley, Aaron Robertson. 2015. Tin Lizzie Dreams: Henry Ford and Antimodern American Culture, 1919-1942. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.

Abstract

“Tin Lizzie Dreams: Henry Ford and Antimodern American Culture, 1919-1942” is an interdisciplinary cultural history combining close analyses of print and broadcast media, music and dance, technology, and built environments to argue that Henry Ford, one of the most popular modernizers in American history, actually espoused and popularized a personal philosophy that was distinctly antimodern. “Tin Lizzie Dreams” shows how Henry Ford’s cultural projects, most often discussed as a side item or supplement to his career as an automaker and industrialist, were in fact indicative of an essential antipathy and even resistance toward the modernity he was helping to create through the rise of the Ford Motor Company and Model T. With projects such as the renovation of the Wayside Inn in Sudbury, Massachusetts, and the practice of holding weekly “old fashioned dances” in Dearborn, Ford created a working antimodern philosophy related to that which T.J. Jackson Lears first traced among East Coast elites at the turn of the twentieth century. Ford then brought his anti-intellectual slant on antimodernism to a mass audience with the creation of the popular Edison Institute museum and Greenfield Village, opened in 1929, and the Ford Sunday Evening Hour radio show, which reached 10 million listeners a week at the height of its 1934-1942 broadcast run. The wider argument of “Tin Lizzie Dreams” is that antimodernism, as an American cultural phenomenon, was not only the purview of Gilded Age elites but also enjoyed broad popular appeal until the outbreak of World War II.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

History, United States

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories

Story
Tin Lizzie Dreams: Henry Ford and… : DASH Story 2025-10-09
I am the author of The Mechanical Boy: An Aviation Enthusiast at Henry Ford’s Wayside Inn Boys School. I am deeply interested in the intersection of Henry Ford’s educational philosophy, his cultural legacy, and the paradox of his modernizing influence set against his longing for the past. Aaron Hartley’s dissertation, Tin Lizzie Dreams, offers a compelling theoretical and historical framework that aligns directly with the central themes of my own research and writing. My book traces the story of a young orphan, Joseph Ochedowski, [...] who attended the Wayside Inn School for Boys—a project Ford conceived as part of his broader vision to restore pre-industrial crafts and values. This real-life experiment in vocational education exemplified Ford’s antimodern impulse: even as he transformed the world through mass production and the mechanization of work, he sought to recover the moral and aesthetic virtues of an earlier, agrarian America. Hartley’s work situates this paradox within a cultural history that extends beyond industry, examining Ford’s creation of nostalgic spaces—Greenfield Village, the Wayside Inn restoration, the “old-fashioned dances” in Dearborn—and his use of media and performance to broadcast an idealized past. These same impulses underpin The Mechanical Boy, which depicts how Ford’s boys were shaped by his conflicting ideals: encouraged to “learn by doing,” in my father's case, to build an airplane, and embrace the modern machine age, while simultaneously being schooled in 19th-century manners, music, and moral discipline. My project aligns with Hartley’s argument by focusing on how Ford’s antimodern philosophy manifested at the individual level—in the life of one boy whose education under Ford’s tutelage became a bridge between the mechanical and the humanistic, between modern innovation and pastoral nostalgia. Access to Hartley’s dissertation allowed me to more fully contextualize these cultural contradictions. Ultimately, I hope to place The Mechanical Boy within the same scholarly conversation that Hartley advances: one that recognizes Henry Ford not merely as a titan of industry but as a complex, even conflicted cultural figure who sought to reconcile the machine age with the moral imagination of a bygone era. Thank you