Publication: The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS!
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2016
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Villar, Jesús, Marcus J. Schultz, and Robert M. Kacmarek. 2016. “The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS!.” Critical Care 20 (1): 108. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1273-x.
Abstract
The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the study’s findings.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service