Publication:

MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in sports-related glenolabral injuries: a matched descriptive illustration

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Jarraya, Mohamed, Frank W. Roemer, Heather I. Gale, Philippe Landreau, Pieter D’Hooghe, and Ali Guermazi. 2016. “MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in sports-related glenolabral injuries: a matched descriptive illustration.” Insights into Imaging 7 (2): 167-177. doi:10.1007/s13244-015-0462-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0462-5.

Abstract

The combination of a large range of motion and insufficient bony stabilization makes the glenohumeral joint susceptible to injuries including dislocation in young athletes. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-arthrography) and computed tomography arthrography (CT-arthrography) play an important role in the preoperative workup of labroligametous injuries. This paper illustrates MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography findings acquired at the same time on the same subjects to illustrate common causes and sequelae of shoulder instability. Teaching Points • MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography are equivalent for SLAP and full-thickness rotator cuff tears. • CT-arthrography is superior in evaluating osseous defects and cartilage surface lesions. • MR-arthrography is superior in evaluating intrasubstance and extra-articular tendinous injuries.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging, Multislice computed tomography, Arthrography, Shoulder, Sports injuries

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories