Publication: Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Economic Association
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Chetty, Raj, John N. Friedman, and Jonah E. Rockoff. 2014. Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates. American Economic Review 104, no. 9: 2593–2632. doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2593.
Abstract
Are teachers' impacts on students' test scores ("value-added") a good measure of their quality? One reason this question has sparked debate is disagreement about whether value-added (VA) measures provide unbiased estimates of teachers' causal impacts on student achievement. We test for bias in VA using previously unobserved parent characteristics and a quasi-experimental design based on changes in teaching staff. Using school district and tax records for more than one million children, we find that VA models which control for a student's prior test scores exhibit little bias in forecasting teachers' impacts on student achievement.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service