Publication: Supercal: Cross-Calibration of Multiple Photometric Systems to Improve Cosmological Measurements with Type Ia Supernovae
Open/View Files
Date
2015
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IOP Publishing
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Scolnic, D., S. Casertano, A. Riess, A. Rest, E. Schlafly, R. J. Foley, D. Finkbeiner, et al. 2015. “Supercal: Cross-Calibration of Multiple Photometric Systems to Improve Cosmological Measurements with Type Ia Supernovae.” The Astrophysical Journal 815 (2) (December 16): 117. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/117.
Research Data
Abstract
Current cosmological analyses which use Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) observations combine SN samples to expand the redshift range beyond that of a single sample and increase the overall sample size. The inhomogeneous photometric calibration between different SN samples is one of the largest systematic uncertainties of the cosmological parameter estimation. To place these different samples on a single system, analyses currently use observations of a small sample of very bright flux standards on the HST system. We propose a complementary method, called ‘Supercal’, in which we use measurements of secondary standards in each system, compare these to measurements of the same stars in the Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) system, and determine offsets for each system relative to PS1, placing all SN observations on a single, consistent photometric system. PS1 has observed 3π of the sky and has a relative calibration of better than 5 mmag (for ∼ 15 < griz < 21 mag), making it an ideal reference system. We use this process to recalibrate optical observations taken by the following SN samples: PS1, SNLS, SDSS, CSP, and CfA1-4. We measure discrepancies on average of 10 mmag, but up to 35 mmag, in various optical passbands. We find that correcting for these differences changes recovered values for the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, w, by on average 2.6%. This change is roughly half the size of current statistical constraints on w. The size of this effect strongly depends on the error in the B − V calibration of the low-z surveys. The Supercal method will allow future analyses to tie past samples to the best calibrated sample.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service