Publication:
From “Whether” to “How”: The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics

Thumbnail Image

Date

2010

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Mehta, Jal. 2010. From ‘Whether’ to ‘How’: The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics. In How Ideas Matter: Reframing Political Research, eds. Daniel Beland and Bob Cox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Research Data

Abstract

This chapter examines ideas of varying levels of generality that define how policymakers should act. Building upon and drawing together the best work in the field, it seeks to offer a synthetic analysis of how ideas matter in politics: what is known, what is not known, and what areas are in need of further research. It considers ideas at three levels of generality: policy solutions, problem definitions, and public philosophies or zeitgeist. It also consider interactions between the levels of ideas, with a particular interest in “upward-flowing” interactions, showing that not only does the conception of a problem constrain policy alternatives, but the fate of specific policy solutions also can have an impact on problem definitions or even broader public philosophies.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

ideas, policymakers, politics, policy solutions, problem definitions, public philosophies, zeitgeist

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories