Publication: Elicitation for Aggregation
Open/View Files
Date
2015
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Frongillo, Rafael M., Yiling Chen, and Ian A. Kash. 2015. Elicitation for Aggregation. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Austin, TX, January 25-30, 2015: 900-906.
Research Data
Abstract
We study the problem of eliciting and aggregating probabilistic information from multiple agents. In order to successfully aggregate the predictions of agents, the principal needs to elicit some notion of confidence from agents, capturing how much experience or knowledge led to their predictions. To formalize this, we consider a principal who wishes to elicit predictions about a random variable from a group of Bayesian agents, each of whom have privately observed some independent samples of the random variable, and hopes to aggregate the predictions as if she had directly observed the samples of all agents. Leveraging techniques from Bayesian statistics, we represent confidence as the number of samples an agent has observed, which is quantified by a hyperparameter from a conjugate family of prior distributions. This then allows us to show that if the principal has access to a few samples, she can achieve her aggregation goal by eliciting predictions from agents using proper scoring rules. In particular, if she has access to one sample, she can successfully aggregate the agents' predictions if and only if every posterior predictive distribution corresponds to a unique value of the hyperparameter. Furthermore, this uniqueness holds for many common distributions of interest. When this uniqueness property does not hold, we construct a novel and intuitive mechanism where a principal with two samples can elicit and optimally aggregate the agents' predictions.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service