Publication:

Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Willenbacher, Ella, Roman Weger, Ursula Rochau, Uwe Siebert, and Wolfgang Willenbacher. 2016. “Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics.” PLoS ONE 11 (3): e0147381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147381.

Abstract

Objective: Clinical trials demonstrate improving survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after treatment. However, it is unclear whether increased survival translates to a similar benefit in a real world setting. Methods: We analyzed the overall survival of 347 multiple myeloma patients in Austria by means of a national registry (AMR), focused on results from 3rd and later lines of therapy. This benchmark was chosen to define a baseline prior to the broad application of upcoming 2nd generation drugs (carfilzomib, pomalidomide). Results: Projected 10 years survival for patients with MM in Austria is estimated to be 56% in patients diagnosed in between the years 2011–2014, 21% in patients with a diagnosis made between 2000–2005, and 39% in those with a diagnosis made between 2006–2010). For the same intervals a significant increase in the use of both bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide—so called IMiDs (from 2005 onwards) and their simultaneous use in combination therapies (from 2010 onwards) could be shown. The use of autologous transplantation (ASCT) remained more or less constant at ~ 35% of patients in the 1st line setting over the whole period, comparing well to international practice patterns, while the use of 2nd line ASCT increased from 5.5% to 18.7% of patients. Patients in 3rd or later line treatment (n = 105), showed that even in relapsed and refractory disease median survival was 27 months with a considerable proportion of long-term survivors (~20%). Conclusion & Perspective With the expected emergence of additional active anti-myeloma compounds, we aim to assess survival in patients with relapsed and refractory MM.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Medicine and Health Sciences, Oncology, Cancers and Neoplasms, Hematologic Cancers and Related Disorders, Myelomas and Lymphoproliferative Diseases, Myelomas, Hematology, Plasma Cell Disorders, Multiple Myeloma, Biology and Life Sciences, Genetics, Cytogenetics, Pharmaceutics, Drug Therapy, Clinical Genetics, Stem Cell Therapy, People and Places, Geographical Locations, Europe, Austria, Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures, Blood and Lymphatic System Procedures, Stem Cell Transplantation, Transplantation, Cell Transplantation, Health Care, Health Care Providers, Medical Doctors, Physicians, Population Groupings, Professions

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories