Publication:
Physical interface dynamics alter how robotic exosuits augment human movement: implications for optimizing wearable assistive devices

Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Yandell, Matthew B., Brendan T. Quinlivan, Dmitry Popov, Conor Walsh, and Karl E. Zelik. 2017. “Physical interface dynamics alter how robotic exosuits augment human movement: implications for optimizing wearable assistive devices.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 14 (1): 40. doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0247-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0247-9.

Research Data

Abstract

Background: Wearable assistive devices have demonstrated the potential to improve mobility outcomes for individuals with disabilities, and to augment healthy human performance; however, these benefits depend on how effectively power is transmitted from the device to the human user. Quantifying and understanding this power transmission is challenging due to complex human-device interface dynamics that occur as biological tissues and physical interface materials deform and displace under load, absorbing and returning power. Methods: Here we introduce a new methodology for quickly estimating interface power dynamics during movement tasks using common motion capture and force measurements, and then apply this method to quantify how a soft robotic ankle exosuit interacts with and transfers power to the human body during walking. We partition exosuit end-effector power (i.e., power output from the device) into power that augments ankle plantarflexion (termed augmentation power) vs. power that goes into deformation and motion of interface materials and underlying soft tissues (termed interface power). Results: We provide empirical evidence of how human-exosuit interfaces absorb and return energy, reshaping exosuit-to-human power flow and resulting in three key consequences: (i) During exosuit loading (as applied forces increased), about 55% of exosuit end-effector power was absorbed into the interfaces. (ii) However, during subsequent exosuit unloading (as applied forces decreased) most of the absorbed interface power was returned viscoelastically. Consequently, the majority (about 75%) of exosuit end-effector work over each stride contributed to augmenting ankle plantarflexion. (iii) Ankle augmentation power (and work) was delayed relative to exosuit end-effector power, due to these interface energy absorption and return dynamics. Conclusions: Our findings elucidate the complexities of human-exosuit interface dynamics during transmission of power from assistive devices to the human body, and provide insight into improving the design and control of wearable robots. We conclude that in order to optimize the performance of wearable assistive devices it is important, throughout design and evaluation phases, to account for human-device interface dynamics that affect power transmission and thus human augmentation benefits. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0247-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description

Keywords

Exoskeleton, Wearable robot, Rehabilitation, Power transfer, Soft tissue, Joint kinetics, Human augmentation, Physical human-robot interaction

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories