Publication:
The effect of federal and state off-label marketing investigations on drug prescribing: The case of olanzapine

Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Wang, Bo, David M. Studdert, Ameet Sarpatwari, Jessica M. Franklin, Joan Landon, and Aaron S. Kesselheim. 2017. “The effect of federal and state off-label marketing investigations on drug prescribing: The case of olanzapine.” PLoS ONE 12 (4): e0175313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175313.

Research Data

Abstract

In the past decade, the federal government has frequently investigated and prosecuted pharmaceutical manufacturers for illegal promotion of drugs for indications not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (“off-label” uses). State governments can choose to coordinate with the federal investigation, or pursue their own independent state investigations. One of the largest-ever off-label prosecutions relates to the atypical antipsychotic drug olanzapine (Zyprexa). In a series of settlements between 2008 and 2010, Eli Lilly paid $1.4 billion to the federal government and over $290 million to state governments. We examined the effect of these settlements on off-label prescribing of this medication, taking advantage of geographical differences in states’ involvement in the investigations and the timing of the settlements. However, we did not find a reduction in off-label prescribing; rather, there were no prescribing changes among states that joined the federal investigation, those that pursued independent state investigations, and states that pursued no investigations at all. Since the settlements of state investigations of off-label prescribing do not appear to significantly impact prescribing rates, policymakers should consider alternate ways of reducing the prevalence of non-evidence-based off-label use to complement their ongoing investigations.

Description

Keywords

Social Sciences, Sociology, Marketing, Medicine and Health Sciences, Pharmacology, Drug Research and Development, Drug Marketing, Drugs, Antipsychotics, Biology and Life Sciences, Psychology, Addiction, Addicts, Drug Users, Health Care, Health Care Providers, Medical Doctors, Physicians, People and Places, Population Groupings, Professions, Political Science, Governments, People and places, Geographical locations, North America, United States, Minnesota, Pennsylvania

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories