Publication:
Disentangling linear and nonlinear brain responses to evoked deep tissue pain

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Loggia, Marco L., Robert R. Edwards, Jieun Kim, Mark G. Vangel, Ajay D. Wasan, Randy L. Gollub, Richard E. Harris, Kyungmo Park, and Vitaly Napadow. 2012. “Disentangling Linear and Nonlinear Brain Responses to Evoked Deep Tissue Pain.” Pain 153 (10) (October): 2140–2151. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.07.014.

Research Data

Abstract

Pain stimuli evoke widespread responses in the brain. However, our understanding of the physiological significance underlying heterogeneous response within different pain-activated and -deactivated regions is still limited. Using functional MRI, we evaluated brain responses to a wide range of stimulus intensity levels (1 innocuous, 7 painful) in order to estimate region-specific stimulus-response functions, which we hypothesized could illuminate that region’s functional relationship to pain. Linear and nonlinear brain responses to pain were estimated through independent Legendre polynomial transformations of pain ratings within a general linear model. This approach identified at least five different, regionally-specific activity profiles in the brain. Linearly increasing (e.g., primary somatosensory/motor cortex, insulae) and intensity-independent (e.g., secondary somatosensory cortex) activation was noted in traditional pain processing areas, potentially reflecting sensory encoding and all-or-none salience responses, respectively. Multiple activity profiles were seen in areas of the default mode network (DMN): intensity-independent deactivation (e.g., posterior cingulate cortex), linearly decreasing (e.g., contralateral inferior parietal lobule), and quadratic (U-shaped; e.g., medial prefrontal cortex). The latter observation suggests that: 1) different DMN subregions exhibit functional heterogeneity and 2) some DMN subregions respond in a percept-related manner to pain, suggesting closer linkage between the DMN and pain processing than previously thought. Future studies should apply a similar approach using innocuous stimuli of multiple intensities in order to evaluate whether the response profiles reported here can also be generalized to nonpainful somatosensory processing.

Description

Keywords

cuff pain algometry, psychophysics, default mode network, neuroimaging, BOLD, human

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories