Publication:

Evaluation of the systemic micro- and macrovasculature in stable angina: A case-control study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Neisius, Ulf, Erin Olson, Sabrina H. Rossi, Hagar A. Ibrahim, Gemma Currie, Anna F. Dominiczak, and Christian Delles. 2017. “Evaluation of the systemic micro- and macrovasculature in stable angina: A case-control study.” PLoS ONE 12 (5): e0178412. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178412.

Abstract

Aims The diagnosis of stable angina involves the use of probability estimates based on clinical presentation, age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors. In view of the link between the cardiac and systemic vasculature we tested whether non-invasive measures of systemic micro- and macrovascular structure and function differentiate between individuals with flow-limiting coronary artery disease (CAD) and those with normal coronary arteries (NCA). Methods and results We recruited 84 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for investigation of symptoms of stable angina. Patients were selected for either having significant CAD or NCA (n = 43/41; age, 56±7 vs 57±7 years, P = 0.309). Only microvascular endothelial function, measured using the Endo-PAT2000 device to determine reactive hyperaemia index (CAD vs. NCA; 1.9 [1.5; 2.3] vs. 2.1 [1.8; 2.4], P = 0.03) and sonographic carotid plaque score (CAD vs. NCA; 3.0 [1.5; 4.5] vs. 1.2 [0; 2.55], P<0.001) were significantly different between patients with CAD and NCA. No significant differences were detected in reflection magnitude (CAD vs. NCA; 1.7 [1.5; 1.8] % vs 1.7 [1.5; 1.9] %, P = 0.342), pulse wave velocity (CAD vs. NCA; 7.8±1.4 m/sec vs. 8.3±1.5 m/sec, P = 0.186), carotid intima-media thickness (CAD vs. NCA; 0.73±0.10 mm vs. 0.75±0.10 mm, P = 0.518) or carotid distensibility (CAD vs. NCA; 3.8±1.2 10-3/kPa vs. 3.4±0.9 10-3/kPa, P = 0.092). Also, the c-statistic of the pre-test probability based on history and traditional risk factors (c = 0.665; 95% CI, 0.540–0.789) was improved by the addition of the inverse RHI (c = 0.720; 95% CI, 0.605–0.836), carotid plaque score (c = 0.770, 95% CI, 0.659–0.881), and of both markers in combination (c = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.701–0.900). Conclusion: There are distinct differences in the systemic vasculature between patients with CAD and NCA that may have the potential to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Carotid artery plaque burden and microvascular function appear to be most promising in this context.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Medicine and Health Sciences, Vascular Medicine, Coronary Heart Disease, Cardiology, Blood Pressure, Angina, Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging, Angiography, Diagnostic Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Techniques, Radiology and Imaging, Biology and Life Sciences, Anatomy, Cardiovascular Anatomy, Blood Vessels, Arteries, Coronary Arteries, Biotechnology, Medical Devices and Equipment, Musculoskeletal System, Limbs (Anatomy), Arms, Hands, Fingers

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories