Publication:
Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

O’Brien, Anthony T., Gabriel T. Acosta, Rodrigo Huerta, and Aurore Thibaut. 2017. Does Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Modify Hand Dexterity? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ Open 7, no. 6. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015669.

Research Data

Abstract

Introduction Dexterity is described as coordinated hand and finger movement for precision tasks. It is essential for day-to-day activities like computer use, writing, or buttoning a shirt. Integrity of brain motor networks is crucial to properly execute these fine hand tasks. When these networks are damaged, interventions to enhance recovery are frequently accompanied by unwanted side effects, or limited in their effect. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are postulated to target affected motor areas and improve hand motor function with few side effects. However, the results across studies vary and the current literature does not allow us to draw clear conclusions on the use of NIBS to promote hand function recovery. Therefore, we developed a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of different NIBS technologies on dexterity in diverse populations. This study will potentially help future evidence-based research and guidelines that use these non-invasive brain stimulation technologies for recovering hand dexterity. Methods and analysis This protocol will compare the effects of active versus sham NIBS on precise hand activity. Records will be obtained by searching relevant databases. Included articles will be randomized clinical trials in adults, testing the therapeutic effects of NIBS on continuous dexterity data. Records will be studied for risk of bias. Narrative and quantitative synthesis will be done. Ethics and dissemination No private health information will be included; furthermore the study is not interventional. Ethical approval is not required. The results will be reported in an international peer-review journal. Registration details This protocol was registered on PROSPERO and can be accessed at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016043809

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories